Stock fact sheet · data as of
GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc. (GCTS): fair value, margin of safety and Wheel Score
Ticker symbol GCTS · Technology · Semiconductors · United States · Speculative
Is GCTS undervalued?
At 1.14 (close of 5 Nov 2026), GCTS has no GLS fair value: every one of the nine models needs a positive input (the company lost money over the last twelve months, EPS -0.64, it pays no dividend and its debts exceed what its assets would fetch), so the margin of safety is blank and the Wheel Score cannot be computed. Our scans leave the stock out at the first filter. What can be said from the nightly row is below.
The nightly engine files GCTS under Speculative - it is losing money or its Piotroski health score is 3 or lower - which caps its Wheel Score at 45 and keeps it out of the Sunday Scan.
Nine valuation models for GCTS
Each model turns the latest filed numbers into a value per share; the GLS fair value is the simple average of the ones that produce a positive number. The last two rows are shown for reference and never enter the average. The Quote page lets you switch any model off and add your own margin of safety.
| Model | Value | vs price | What it measures |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | - | - | Present value of the projected free cash flows, discounted at the cost of capital; no value tonight |
| Graham Number | - | - | The most a defensive investor pays for the earnings and book value per share; no value tonight |
| Graham Growth | - | - | Graham's growth formula: EPS × (8.5 + 2 × growth), adjusted for bond yields; no value tonight |
| Lynch | - | - | EPS × the earnings growth rate (PEG of 1), growth capped at 25%; no value tonight |
| GLS Growth | - | - | EPS compounded ten years at the blended growth rate, discounted back at 15% a year; no value tonight |
| 10 Cap | - | - | Owner's earnings (operating cash flow less maintenance capex) capitalised at 10%; no value tonight |
| Payback Time | - | - | Eight years of compounded free cash flow: the price at which the business pays for itself; no value tonight |
| DDM | - | - | Dividend discount model: next year's dividend ÷ (10% − 3% growth); needs a dividend; no value tonight |
| EPV | - | - | Earnings power value: current EPS capitalised at 9% with no growth; no value tonight |
| Zombie (liquidation) | -0.9570 | -184% | Current assets less all liabilities, per share: the balance-sheet floor. Not in the average |
| Wall St target | 3.00 | +163% | Analysts' average 12-month price target. Not in the average |
Quality and financial health
GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc. scores only 2 of 9 on the Piotroski F-score, which fails the "Piotroski 6 or more" Wheel Trade Filter. A reading this low means several of the basic tests - positive earnings, positive operating cash flow, falling debt, no new share issuance - are not met. A GLS Moat score of 0.0/10 is a weak reading: the accounts do not show returns and margins that competitors have been unable to wear down, so the Moat part of the Wheel Score contributes little.
Returns on capital are high - ROIC 217.6%, ROE 52.1%, ROA -277.2% - with debt at -0.76 times equity and negative free cash flow.
GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc. pays no dividend, so the DDM model does not apply and a covered-call holder earns only the premium and any price gain. Revenue comes mainly from Service 62%, Product 38% (quarter Q1 FY2026).
Institutional ownership scores 2/10, insider activity 10/10 and Congressional trading 5/10 on the GLS smart-money scales.
| Piotroski F-score | 2 / 9 | ROIC | 217.6% |
|---|---|---|---|
| GLS Moat | 0.0 / 10 | ROE | 52.1% |
| Debt / equity | -0.76 | ROA | -277.2% |
| Free-cash-flow yield | -39.2% | Payout ratio | 0% |
| Institutions | 2 / 10 | Insiders · Congress | 10 · 5 / 10 |
Wheel Score 4: Weak
With a Wheel Score of 4 GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc. sits in the Weak band. It fails filter 1, options that actually trade - options too quiet (123 open interest, 72 a day); and filter 2, a real business, not a gamble - speculative (a loss, or a weak Piotroski score); and filter 3, below fair value - trades right at our fair value; and filter 4, financially healthy - Piotroski 2/9 (under 6); and filter 5, can repay its debt - debt with no positive cash flow to repay it; and filter 6, no serious red flags - Red Flags score 55 (under 60); and filter 7, a premium worth selling - implied volatility 337% (over 80%); and filter 8, big enough - market cap $104M (under $1.0B); and filter 9, not a penny stock - price 1.14 (under $5); Value (weak) is its weakest part.
Implied volatility is 337%, above the 80% ceiling of the Wheel Trade Filter on premium. The premium looks generous, but moves of that size can blow through any strike. Chain open interest is thin - 123 contracts across every expiry - so fills at a fair price are not guaranteed; a 30-45-day put may not exist at a usable strike.
Volume runs at 1.4M shares a day on a market cap of $104M, with a beta of 1.85 - a high beta, so the stock tends to move more than the market and a strike can be gapped through; the Stability part of the Wheel Score rates that weak.
| Filter | Wheel Trade Filter | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Options that actually trade | Fails | options too quiet (123 open interest, 72 a day) |
| 2 | A real business, not a gamble | Fails | speculative (a loss, or a weak Piotroski score) |
| 3 | Below fair value | Fails | trades right at our fair value |
| 4 | Financially healthy | Fails | Piotroski 2/9 (under 6) |
| 5 | Can repay its debt | Fails | debt with no positive cash flow to repay it |
| 6 | No serious red flags | Fails | Red Flags score 55 (under 60) |
| 7 | A premium worth selling | Fails | implied volatility 337% (over 80%) |
| 8 | Big enough | Fails | market cap $104M (under $1.0B) |
| 9 | Not a penny stock | Fails | price 1.14 (under $5) |
| How it ranks | Rating | From | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Value | Weak | 0% below fair value | |
| Premium | Weak | implied volatility 337% | |
| Moat | Weak | moat 0.0/10 | |
| Health | Weak | Piotroski 2/9 | |
| Red Flags | Weak | Red Flags score 55/100 | |
| Option trading | Weak | 72 contracts a day, 123 open interest | |
| Stability | Weak | beta 1.85, $104M company |
The Wheel Score ranks ~7,400 US stocks for selling cash-secured puts and covered calls: a stock must pass all 9 Wheel Trade Filters to score 70, and the score then ranks the ones that pass; the Sunday Scan is the top 10. It is updated nightly and is not a recommendation. How the Wheel Score works · the walkthrough lesson shows how it fits into a trade, start to finish.
Upcoming events
GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc. reports earnings on 12 Nov 2026 (after the close) - inside the 14-day window the Sunday Scan avoids, because a put sold now would carry the report's gap risk.
Earnings, dividend, IPO, split and economic calendars for the whole market, filterable to your watchlists.
Similar stocks in Semiconductors
The 12 companies below are the closest to GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc. by market cap within the Semiconductors industry, each with its own fact sheet; the Compare page puts up to eight of them side by side.
| Stock | Close | Fair value | MoS | Wheel | Mkt cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NA Nano Labs Ltd | 1.62 | 27,672.29 | +100% | 18Weak | $109M |
| ATOM Atomera Incorporated | 2.86 | 0.5641 | -407% | 8Weak | $112M |
| MX MagnaChip Semiconductor | 2.41 | - | - | 8Weak | $92M |
| SODI Solitron Devices, Inc. | 38.50 | 26.55 | -45% | 21No options | $83M |
| GSIT GSI Technology, Inc. | 3.64 | - | - | 11Weak | $140M |
| ALMU Aeluma, Inc. | 7.26 | - | - | 12Weak | $140M |
| QUIK QuickLogic Corporation | 8.26 | - | - | 15Weak | $151M |
| VLN Valens Semiconductor Ltd. | 1.49 | - | - | 11Weak | $161M |
| INVE INVE Technologies, Inc. | 2.64 | 4.94 | +47% | 29Weak | $64M |
| INTT inTEST Corporation | 14.00 | 6.15 | -128% | 30Weak | $180M |
| GUER Guerrilla RF, Inc. | 5.10 | 5,913.62 | +100% | 28No options | $56M |
| LAES SEALSQ Corp | 1.43 | 0.2129 | -572% | 20Weak | $204M |
Scan the whole market the same way
A free GLS Equity account gets you nightly fair value and the Wheel Score on ~7,400 US stocks, a watchlist, the scanner preview and the Sunday Scan - the top 10 stocks that pass all 9 Wheel Trade Filters, emailed every week. Pro adds the full put and call scanners, unlimited watchlists with alerts and the trade journal.
Start free See the Sunday ScanQuestions about GCTS
Is GCTS undervalued right now?
The GLS models could not value GCTS (the company lost money over the last twelve months, EPS -0.64, it pays no dividend and its debts exceed what its assets would fetch), so there is no fair value or margin of safety to compare the price of 1.14 against.
What is the Wheel Score of GCTS and what does it mean?
GCTS scores 4 out of 100 (Weak) - it fails Wheel Trade Filters 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. The Wheel Score ranks stocks for the wheel strategy - selling cash-secured puts, then covered calls if assigned - in two parts: the 9 pass/fail Wheel Trade Filters (busy options, a real business, below fair value, Piotroski 6 or more, debt it can repay, a Red Flags score of 60 or more, implied volatility of 25-80%, a $1 billion company, $5 a share) and a ranking of how strongly a stock passes on value, premium, moat, health, red flags, option trading and stability. A stock that fails any filter stays under 70; 70-84 is Good, 85 and above is Prime. The Sunday Scan is the top 10 that pass, sorted by Wheel Score.
What is the GLS fair value for GCTS?
None of the nine GLS models produced a positive value for GCTS (the company lost money over the last twelve months, EPS -0.64, it pays no dividend and its debts exceed what its assets would fetch), so there is no GLS fair value tonight.
When does GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc. report earnings next?
The next earnings report is due on 12 Nov 2026 (after the close), 7 days from the data date of 5 Nov 2026. The Calendars page lists every upcoming report with its time of day.
Does GCTS have listed options, and how liquid are they?
Yes. The nightly snapshot found 6 listed contracts with 123 open interest across all expiries and implied volatility of 337% on the near-the-money contracts. The Options scanner lists the cash-secured put and covered call set-ups with premium and annualised yield worked out.