Stock fact sheet · data as of
Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM): fair value, margin of safety and Wheel Score
Technology · Computer Hardware · United States · ADR · Speculative / Distressed
Is NNDM undervalued?
At 1.44 (close of 16 Oct 2026), NNDM has no GLS fair value: every one of the nine models needs a positive input (the company lost money over the last twelve months, EPS -0.78 and it pays no dividend), so the margin of safety is blank and the Wheel Score cannot be computed. Our screens leave the stock out at the first rule. What can be said from the nightly row is below.
The nightly engine files NNDM under Speculative / Distressed - negative earnings or a Piotroski score of 3 or less - which caps its Wheel Score at 45 and keeps it out of the Sunday Scan.
Nine valuation models for NNDM
Each model turns the latest filed numbers into a value per share; the GLS fair value is the simple average of the ones that produce a positive number. The last two rows are shown for reference and never enter the average. The Quote page lets you switch any model off and add your own margin of safety.
| Model | Value | vs price | What it measures |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | - | - | Present value of the projected free cash flows, discounted at the cost of capital; no value tonight |
| Graham Number | - | - | The most a defensive investor pays for the earnings and book value per share; no value tonight |
| Graham Growth | - | - | Graham's growth formula: EPS × (8.5 + 2 × growth), adjusted for bond yields; no value tonight |
| Lynch | - | - | EPS × the earnings growth rate (PEG of 1), growth capped at 25%; no value tonight |
| GLS Growth | - | - | EPS compounded ten years at the blended growth rate, discounted back at 15% a year; no value tonight |
| 10 Cap | - | - | Owner's earnings (operating cash flow less maintenance capex) capitalised at 10%; no value tonight |
| Payback Time | - | - | Eight years of compounded free cash flow: the price at which the business pays for itself; no value tonight |
| DDM | - | - | Dividend discount model: next year's dividend ÷ (10% − 3% growth); needs a dividend; no value tonight |
| EPV | - | - | Earnings power value: current EPS capitalised at 9% with no growth; no value tonight |
| Zombie (liquidation) | 2.03 | +41% | Current assets less all liabilities, per share: the balance-sheet floor. Not in the average |
| Wall St target | 0.0000 | -100% | Analysts' average 12-month price target. Not in the average |
Quality and financial health
Nano Dimension Ltd. scores 5 of 9 on the Piotroski F-score: a middling result that falls one point short of the Sunday Scan's "6 or more" rule. Some of the nine tests on profitability, leverage and efficiency are failed, so the accounts are worth a look before selling a put on the name. A GLS Moat score of 1.5/10 is a weak reading: the ten-year history the score grades (revenue, EPS, book value, margins, cash flow, share count, ROIC) has not been steady, so the Moat part of the Wheel Score contributes little.
Returns on capital are thin or negative - ROIC -52.3%, ROE -53.1%, ROA -46.0% - with debt at 0.02 times equity and negative free cash flow.
Nano Dimension Ltd. pays no dividend, so the DDM model does not apply and a covered-call holder earns only the premium and any price gain. Revenue comes mainly from Product 83%, Service 17% (quarter Q2 FY2026).
Institutional ownership scores 4/10, insider activity 5/10 and Congressional trading 5/10 on the GLS smart-money scales.
| Piotroski F-score | 5 / 9 | ROIC | -52.3% |
|---|---|---|---|
| GLS Moat | 1.5 / 10 | ROE | -53.1% |
| Debt / equity | 0.02 | ROA | -46.0% |
| Free-cash-flow yield | -21.4% | Payout ratio | 0% |
| Institutions | 4 / 10 | Insiders · Congress | 5 · 5 / 10 |
Wheel Score 45: Weak
With a Wheel Score of 45 Nano Dimension Ltd. sits in the Weak band, capped at 45 because the engine files it as Speculative / Distressed. The parts - Value 13/25, Health 11/20, Moat 2/15, Premium 18/20, Stability 13/20 - show where: Moat (2/15) scores lowest.
Implied volatility is 67% on the near-the-money contracts 20-60 days out - above the 60% ceiling of the sweet spot. Premiums are large, but the Wheel Score tapers the Premium points (18 of 20) because volatility this high usually comes with a reason. The option chain is deep: 135,739 contracts of open interest across all expiries, which means tight fills at most strikes.
Volume runs at 1.4M shares a day on a market cap of $312M, with a beta of 0.99; the Stability part of the Wheel Score gives that 13 of 20.
| Part | Points | From | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Value | 13 / 25 | 0% margin of safety | |
| Health | 11 / 20 | Piotroski 5/9 | |
| Moat | 2 / 15 | moat 1.5/10 | |
| Premium | 18 / 20 | implied volatility 67% | |
| Stability | 13 / 20 | 1.4M shares/day, $312M cap, beta 0.99 |
The Wheel Score ranks ~7,400 US stocks for selling cash-secured puts and covered calls; it is updated nightly and is not a recommendation. The walkthrough lesson shows how the score fits into a trade, start to finish.
Upcoming events
The next earnings report is due on 5 Nov 2026, 20 days away; a 30-45-day put sold today would expire after it, which is worth weighing against the premium.
Earnings, dividend, IPO, split and economic calendars for the whole market, filterable to your watchlists.
Similar stocks in Computer Hardware
The 12 companies below are the closest to Nano Dimension Ltd. by market cap within the Computer Hardware industry, each with its own fact sheet; the Compare page puts up to eight of them side by side.
| Stock | Close | Fair value | MoS | Wheel | Mkt cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BGIN Bgin Blockchain Limited | 1.96 | 0.6690 | -193% | 9No options | $222M |
| DDD 3D Systems Corporation | 2.96 | - | - | 44Weak | $492M |
| OSS One Stop Systems, Inc. | 6.55 | 1.40 | -366% | 35Weak | $163M |
| SSYS Stratasys Ltd. | 7.04 | - | - | 45Weak | $617M |
| QMCO Quantum Corporation | 23.86 | - | - | 37Weak | $940M |
| CAN Canaan Inc. | 0.2521 | - | - | 34Weak | $101M |
| QBAK Qualstar Corporation | 4.50 | 0.3055 | -1373% | 15No options | $76M |
| CRCT Cricut, Inc. | 6.70 | 7.80 | +14% | 76Good | $1.4B |
| QUBT Quantum Computing, Inc. | 6.31 | 4.46 | -42% | 32Weak | $1.4B |
| CRSR Corsair Gaming, Inc. | 13.24 | 6.55 | -102% | 50Fair | $1.4B |
| YIBO Planet Image International Limited Class A | 1.12 | 1.22 | +9% | 22No options | $66M |
| AMCI AMC Robotics Corporation | 2.53 | 0.4973 | -409% | 17No options | $60M |
Screen the whole market the same way
A free GLS Equity account gets you nightly fair value and the Wheel Score on ~7,400 US stocks, a watchlist, the scanner preview and the Sunday Scan - the same eight-rule screen, emailed every week. Pro adds the full put and call scanners, unlimited watchlists with alerts and the trade journal.
Start free See the Sunday ScanQuestions about NNDM
Is NNDM undervalued right now?
The GLS models could not value NNDM (the company lost money over the last twelve months, EPS -0.78 and it pays no dividend), so there is no fair value or margin of safety to compare the price of 1.44 against.
What is the Wheel Score of NNDM and what does it mean?
NNDM scores 45 out of 100 (Weak). The Wheel Score blends the margin of safety (25 points), Piotroski health (20), the GLS moat (15), the option premium on offer (20) and trading stability (20) into one number that ranks stocks for the wheel strategy - selling cash-secured puts, then covered calls if assigned. 80 and above is Prime, 65-79 Good, 50-64 Fair, under 50 Weak.
What is the GLS fair value for NNDM?
None of the nine GLS models produced a positive value for NNDM (the company lost money over the last twelve months, EPS -0.78 and it pays no dividend), so there is no GLS fair value tonight.
When does Nano Dimension Ltd. report earnings next?
The next earnings report is due on 5 Nov 2026, 20 days from the data date of 16 Oct 2026. The Calendars page lists every upcoming report with its time of day.
Does NNDM have listed options, and how liquid are they?
Yes. The nightly snapshot found 110 listed contracts with 135,739 open interest across all expiries and implied volatility of 67% on the near-the-money contracts. The Options scanner lists the cash-secured put and covered call set-ups with premium and annualised yield worked out.